Prevent re-review and dismiss review actions on closed and merged PRs (#30065)

Resolves #29965.

---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR

And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:

<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">

(cherry picked from commit 242b331260925e604150346e61329097d5731e77)

models/issues/review.go

@@ -66,6 +66,23 @@ func (err ErrNotValidReviewRequest) Unwrap() error {
 	return util.ErrInvalidArgument
 }
 
+// ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR represents an error when an user tries to request a re-review on a closed or merged PR.
+type ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR struct{}
+
+// IsErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR checks if an error is an ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR.
+func IsErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR(err error) bool {
+	_, ok := err.(ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR)
+	return ok
+}
+
+func (err ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR) Error() string {
+	return "cannot request a re-review on a closed or merged PR"
+}
+
+func (err ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR) Unwrap() error {
+	return util.ErrPermissionDenied
+}
+
 // ReviewType defines the sort of feedback a review gives
 type ReviewType int
 
@@ -618,9 +635,24 @@ func AddReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer, doer *user_mo
 		return nil, err
 	}
 
-	// skip it when reviewer hase been request to review
-	if review != nil && review.Type == ReviewTypeRequest {
-		return nil, committer.Commit() // still commit the transaction, or committer.Close() will rollback it, even if it's a reused transaction.
+	if review != nil {
+		// skip it when reviewer hase been request to review
+		if review.Type == ReviewTypeRequest {
+			return nil, committer.Commit() // still commit the transaction, or committer.Close() will rollback it, even if it's a reused transaction.
+		}
+
+		if issue.IsClosed {
+			return nil, ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR{}
+		}
+
+		if issue.IsPull {
+			if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
+				return nil, err
+			}
+			if issue.PullRequest.HasMerged {
+				return nil, ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR{}
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 	// if the reviewer is an official reviewer,

models/issues/review_test.go

@@ -288,3 +288,33 @@ func TestDeleteDismissedReview(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, issues_model.DeleteReview(db.DefaultContext, review))
 	unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{ID: comment.ID})
 }
+
+func TestAddReviewRequest(t *testing.T) {
+	assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
+
+	pull := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 1})
+	assert.NoError(t, pull.LoadIssue(db.DefaultContext))
+	issue := pull.Issue
+	assert.NoError(t, issue.LoadRepo(db.DefaultContext))
+	reviewer := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1})
+	_, err := issues_model.CreateReview(db.DefaultContext, issues_model.CreateReviewOptions{
+		Issue:    issue,
+		Reviewer: reviewer,
+		Type:     issues_model.ReviewTypeReject,
+	})
+
+	assert.NoError(t, err)
+	pull.HasMerged = false
+	assert.NoError(t, pull.UpdateCols(db.DefaultContext, "has_merged"))
+	issue.IsClosed = true
+	_, err = issues_model.AddReviewRequest(db.DefaultContext, issue, reviewer, &user_model.User{})
+	assert.Error(t, err)
+	assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR(err))
+
+	pull.HasMerged = true
+	assert.NoError(t, pull.UpdateCols(db.DefaultContext, "has_merged"))
+	issue.IsClosed = false
+	_, err = issues_model.AddReviewRequest(db.DefaultContext, issue, reviewer, &user_model.User{})
+	assert.Error(t, err)
+	assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR(err))
+}