#2743 and #2751 fix bad SQL generated by XORM

Use hand-written SQL to do complex query
This commit is contained in:
Unknwon 2016-03-04 13:08:47 -05:00
parent f6759a731a
commit d57a2b908a
5 changed files with 17 additions and 19 deletions

View file

@ -1054,11 +1054,10 @@ func RemoveOrgRepo(orgID, repoID int64) error {
// GetUserRepositories gets all repositories of an organization,
// that the user with the given userID has access to.
func (org *User) GetUserRepositories(userID int64) (err error) {
teams := make([]*Team, 0, 10)
if err = x.Where("`team_user`.org_id=?", org.Id).
And("`team_user`.uid=?", userID).
Join("INNER", "`team_user`", "`team_user`.team_id=`team`.id").
Find(&teams); err != nil {
teams := make([]*Team, 0, org.NumTeams)
if err = x.Sql(`SELECT team.id FROM team
INNER JOIN team_user ON team_user.team_id = team.id
WHERE team_user.org_id = ? AND team_user.uid = ?`, org.Id, userID).Find(&teams); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("get teams: %v", err)
}
@ -1071,18 +1070,15 @@ func (org *User) GetUserRepositories(userID int64) (err error) {
teamIDs = append(teamIDs, "-1") // there is no repo with id=-1
}
// Due to a bug in xorm using IN() together with OR() is impossible.
// As a workaround, we have to build the IN statement on our own, until this is fixed.
// https://github.com/go-xorm/xorm/issues/342
if err = x.Join("INNER", "`team_repo`", "`team_repo`.repo_id=`repository`.id").
Where("`repository`.owner_id=?", org.Id).
And("`repository`.is_private=?", false).
Or("`team_repo`.team_id IN (?)", strings.Join(teamIDs, ",")).
GroupBy("`repository`.id").
Find(&org.Repos); err != nil {
repos := make([]*Repository, 0, 5)
if err = x.Sql(`SELECT repository.* FROM repository
INNER JOIN team_repo ON team_repo.repo_id = repository.id
WHERE (repository.owner_id = ? AND repository.is_private = ?) OR team_repo.team_id IN (?)
GROUP BY repository.id`,
org.Id, false, strings.Join(teamIDs, ",")).Find(&repos); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("get repositories: %v", err)
}
org.Repos = repos
// FIXME: should I change this value inside method,
// or only in location of caller where it's really needed?