- Forgejo has the option to delete users, in which all data except
issues and comments are removed, this makes sense in some cases where
users need to be removed cleanly but without removing their existing bug
reports or comments to an discussion. In the case of spammers, admins
have the option to enable purging, where comments are removed.
- Add issues to the list of things to be removed if purge is checked.
- No unit testing, as this gigantic function doesn't have one to begin
with.
- Add integration test.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1268
(cherry picked from commit 3ed381c75826ffc6834fd54943f71579c060c16d)
(cherry picked from commit 44d00650ce77bd4395892a62a64a90829578c81d)
(cherry picked from commit 7f4da82779fa1d761b5fe045d3e0b4b2627638c0)
(cherry picked from commit d629314def8e3e6d0f78184aa584fa57ece18bb1)
Conflicts:
models/fixtures/issue.yml
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1508
(cherry picked from commit 794dcc218f2c0c53028aaf617407d46bddda57f3)
(cherry picked from commit c433f2ecb60669e5c8748912b30c0433d5fe507a)
(cherry picked from commit bb23683f4b10a504da677843bc2ae2b73ec299c4)
(cherry picked from commit 634c5604d430b1b531467783bc70bb4efbee023d)
(cherry picked from commit 219073f5c5558e7712039a83754f68b092689963)
(cherry picked from commit 32893dbab139e2d238db8c3d7878321c6bdd0cd3)
(cherry picked from commit 0ef40cfb5a23d9f654e093ade2668d82ce8d333a)
(cherry picked from commit e535409cab3c276fd8db6b402f85934ef5127491)
(cherry picked from commit 29059f611b5617d275737996b9e4076a3b0b667e)
(cherry picked from commit cd480c5b8b99feed11a3797ab36a697cd0dcc91b)
(cherry picked from commit 340e6573924dbd8d69843c69243e6b027c66f166)
(cherry picked from commit 3a7a5564d02bde767cb14cbc30e3ca816808f7d6)
(cherry picked from commit 1dbcaca726f3cbd777a4965b7414d6b60050ba54)
(cherry picked from commit c491c439e28f04fdd0f002ec1403b19933afc7c3)
(cherry picked from commit c8fe2140cc15dcffa9bb7c966493707ac23cdb74)
(cherry picked from commit c72564e3ee1bd9972d4f7d7a7e1dc34bb8d81299)
(cherry picked from commit 2084f3fa113bca751be0689f53dfeb7d059ffb8f)
(cherry picked from commit 918e65327da011303ba7dfb3ff6970b8c83f5319)
To keep weblate happy as it would otherwise be duplicating the content
to all sections.
See https://github.com/WeblateOrg/weblate/issues/10831 for more information.
(cherry picked from commit 5ffc10a00e1ceb24755894e981d3d26d654b4b7e)
(cherry picked from commit 96d10e793b72e39656cc0df02272c7dd7632964c)
Fixes#27114.
* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.
For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.
So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Mainly for MySQL/MSSQL.
It is important for Gitea to use case-sensitive database charset
collation. If the database is using a case-insensitive collation, Gitea
will show startup error/warning messages, and show the errors/warnings
on the admin panel's Self-Check page.
Make `gitea doctor convert` work for MySQL to convert the collations of
database & tables & columns.
* Fix#28131
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
It is not quite breaking, but it's highly recommended to convert the
database&table&column to a consistent and case-sensitive collation.
Resolves https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28451.
This change follows the recommendation by wxiaoguang to remove the
"Disable Minimum Key Size Check" from the "Service Configuration"
section of the UI, because this option belongs to the "SSH
Configuration" section of the administration menu and already has a
functioning indicator in that section of the UI.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Some translations are duplicated for the same package fields; it should
be possible to use the same approach. Checked packages to use the same
forms in templates.
1. Removed repeated translations for the same fields
2. Linked template files to the same translation fields
3. Added repository site link for nuget packages
* Show checkout instructions also when there is no permission to push,
for anyone who wants to locally test the changes.
* First checkout the branch exactly as is, without immediately having to
solve merge conflicts. Leave this to the merge step, since it's often
convenient to test a change without worrying about this.
* Use `git fetch -u`, so an existing local branch is updated when
re-testing the same pull request. But not the more risky `git fetch -f`
in to handle force pushes, as we don't want to accidentally overwrite
important local changes.
* Show different merge command depending on the chosen merge style,
interactively updated.
This PR will show the _noreply_ address in the privacy popup
_keep_email_private_popup_.
I had to look into the source code to figure out which E-Mail Adress I
had to use on gitea.com to hide it from public access.
According to the contribution guidelines I only updated the en-US
translation file.
Co-authored-by: Hakito <hakito@git.example.com>
Per the discussion on #22054, the flow for adding a new team member to
an org is not intuitive for new Gitea users.
The ideal solution would be to add a new button on the Org > Members
index view (see the screenshot mockup in the issue description).
However, this would require a refactor of the UX for the flow. The
current flow has an implicit context of which team within the org the
new member is being added to ('Owners' by default). From the Members
index, there is no implicit context; the flow would have to add a picker
for which team the new member should be added to.
So, as a stopgap, this change simply adds a button to the Teams index
page that performs the same action as clicking on the title of the team
(a behavior that is currently too obscure as indicated in the comments
on the issue). This should reduce support burden and serve as a decent
temporary measure until the Add Member flow is refactored.
---------
Co-authored-by: tomholford <tomholford@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#27455
> The mechanism responsible for long-term authentication (the 'remember
me' cookie) uses a weak construction technique. It will hash the user's
hashed password and the rands value; it will then call the secure cookie
code, which will encrypt the user's name with the computed hash. If one
were able to dump the database, they could extract those two values to
rebuild that cookie and impersonate a user. That vulnerability exists
from the date the dump was obtained until a user changed their password.
>
> To fix this security issue, the cookie could be created and verified
using a different technique such as the one explained at
https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies.
The PR removes the now obsolete setting `COOKIE_USERNAME`.
This PR reduces the complexity of the system setting system.
It only needs one line to introduce a new option, and the option can be
used anywhere out-of-box.
It is still high-performant (and more performant) because the config
values are cached in the config system.
- switch from some weird status badge to label
- translate untranslated `Reset registration token` string
- change documentation link from act_runner README to Gitea Docs site
- fix "No runners available" message width
- use `ctx.Locale.Tr` where possible
![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/65547228-f9ed-4f80-9cfd-df5e55513a44)
Closes#26329
This PR adds the ability to ignore revisions specified in the
`.git-blame-ignore-revs` file in the root of the repository.
![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/9e91be0c-6e9c-431c-bbe9-5f80154251c8)
The banner is displayed in this case. I intentionally did not add a UI
way to bypass the ignore file (same behaviour as Github) but you can add
`?bypass-blame-ignore=true` to the url manually.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>