13 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gusted
|
15c64122a6
|
[BUG] Don't fire notification for comment of pending review
- When a comment was updated or deleted and was part of an pending/ongoing review, it would have triggered a notification, such as a webhook. - This patch checks if the comment is part of a pending review and then does not fire a notification and, in the case of updating a comment, does not save the content history because this is not necessary if it is still a "draft" comment given it is a pending comment (there is no need to see my embarrassing typos). - Adds integration tests. - Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4368 |
||
metiftikci
|
ca0921a95a
|
Prevent simultaneous editing of comments and issues (#31053)
fixes #22907
Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist
(cherry picked from commit aa92b13164e84c26be91153b6022220ce0a27720)
Conflicts:
models/issues/comment.go
|
||
|
Gusted
|
9bb188176e
|
[MODERATION] Block issue creation when blocked by repo owner (squash)
- Block the creation of a issue if the user is blocked by the repository owner. - Fix integration tests (This should ideally in the future all be self-created fixtures instead of relying on the existing ones as a small condition can make the tests be inaccurate). (cherry picked from commit 88d3ee333aa91814bbe0b11d9fc1e62ffecae1b9) (cherry picked from commit 146c82d232a5a4a81bbbebcae568b5c3b6117804) (cherry picked from commit d9dc25d0382acf819900eae5f652d682c3594ef5) (cherry picked from commit cd1eadd9234205bce443e61c52415de342493b13) (cherry picked from commit 40a8584bbb4768d2527ad1558034ebd2ea1f5077) |
||
|
Gusted
|
2da33aae2d
|
[MODERATION] User blocking
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page. - This will unstar their repositories and visa versa. - Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations). - Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests. - Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments. - Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540 (cherry picked from commit 687d852480388897db4d7b0cb397cf7135ab97b1) (cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde531018f74e01d9db6520895fcfa10cc) (cherry picked from commit 1791130e3cb8470b9b39742e0004d5e4c7d1e64d) (cherry picked from commit 37858b7e8fb6ba6c6ea0ac2562285b3b144efa19) (cherry picked from commit a3e2bfd7e9eab82cc2c17061f6bb4e386a108c46) (cherry picked from commit 7009b9fe87696b6182fab65ae82bf5a25cd39971) Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014 routers/web/user/profile.go templates/user/profile.tmpl (cherry picked from commit b2aec3479177e725cfc7cbbb9d94753226928d1c) (cherry picked from commit e2f1b73752f6bd3f830297d8f4ac438837471226) [MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802) - Resolves #476 - Follow up for: #540 - Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other. - Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories. - Add unblock button to the blocked user list. - Add blocked since information to the blocked user list. - Add extra testing to moderation code. - Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking. - Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful. - Add "You haven't blocked any users" message. - Add organization blocking a user. Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802 (cherry picked from commit 0505a1042197bd9136b58bc70ec7400a23471585) (cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b85e97d651cf350c9f3ea272ee8d76a) (cherry picked from commit c17c121f2cf1f00e2a8d6fd6847705df47d0771e) [MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802) (squash) Changes to adapt to: |
||
Earl Warren
|
c7a389f2b2
|
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)
[this is a follow-up to PR #764]
When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.
-----
Comment:
While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...
I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1dab4f6f3678d79a394da56e6447ebbe1)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c875a4c4e65c02ef0c4e3b941f4da4371)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f610837d34844bb79cda1360ab23b6b1c)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c449322901a0acf6d0857eac4716581)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a
(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9e4af612a628171bd4f63a24860c272)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d3e9e22017fd74045bcdc1109bd06df)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6dd177980f3d9f367122ffc2fec8986)
(cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a490faeccb85088fa0981dd50f7199eb8)
(cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c20e53ae616a7e53d63c3b51809585fb)
(cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a747c14fb1b5b4271db6c10abbf86d586)
|
||
JakobDev
|
cf0df023be
|
More db.DefaultContext refactor (#27265)
Part of #27065 This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think some tests from other persons do not hurt. |
||
Lunny Xiao
|
540bf9fa6d
|
Move notification interface to services layer (#26915)
Extract from #22266 |
||
caicandong
|
6151e69d95
|
Delete issue_service.CreateComment (#26298)
I noticed that `issue_service.CreateComment` adds transaction operations on `issues_model.CreateComment`, we can merge the two functions and we can avoid calling each other's methods in the `services` layer. Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> |
||
|
Lunny Xiao
|
b167f35113
|
Add context parameter to some database functions (#26055)
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be have ctx as the first parameter. This PR do a refactor for some of these functions. |
||
wxiaoguang
|
de2268ffab
|
Fix issue attachment handling (#24202)
Close #24195
Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
|
||
|
wxiaoguang
|
cfe3d6e9b5
|
Make more functions use ctx instead of db.DefaultContext (#24068)
Continue the "ctx refactoring" work. There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause database deadlock errors. |
||
Jason Song
|
6135359a04
|
Always reuse transaction (#22362) | ||
|
Lunny Xiao
|
68704532c2
|
Rename almost all Ctx functions (#22071) |
Renamed from services/comments/comments.go (Browse further)