GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for a new specific kind of event: Changing the
target branch of a PR. When detected, it is downloaded using Gitea's
type for this event, and eventually uploaded into Gitea in the expected
format, i.e. with no text content in the comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of this type.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L102)
(cherry picked from commit 6e5966597c2d498d1a8540dad965461d44ff8e57)
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for two specific kinds of events: Scheduling and
un-scheduling of automatic merges on a PR. When detected, they are
downloaded using Gitea's type for these events, and eventually uploaded
into Gitea in the expected format, i.e. with no text content in the
comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these two types.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L6-L17)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a70c00b80bcb5de8479e407f1b8f08dcf756019d)
Closes#1789.
The bug was due to the fact that GitLab does not guarantee that issue numbers are created sequentially: some identifiers can be skipped. Therefore, the new pull requests numbers should not be offset by the number of issues, but by the maximum issue number.
See for instance https://gitlab.com/troyengel/archbuild/-/issues/?sort=created_date&state=all&first_page_size=20, where there is only a singe issue with number "2".
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1790
Co-authored-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu>
Co-committed-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu>
(cherry picked from commit 2c185c39fe600041701d5f59cb1076a788815cb4)
(cherry picked from commit 8f68dc4c9c2f0acab55d59a496b0f141befad969)
(cherry picked from commit 7e932b7fca1b119e7cc646183c383ba51a5f1d14)
(cherry picked from commit 6bbe75ecf8ac502bd42ff5765e6e7733f290a54e)
(cherry picked from commit b18c2e8d658c3311e0a299696bd1b6612c52ef13)
Conflicts:
services/migrations/gitlab.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2075
(cherry picked from commit abc129c762b3c1a992ad5c67adf62d8336eadbbe)
(cherry picked from commit 28884fac10c455a9f40bebd961fca40afd4a749e)
(cherry picked from commit 5f528dd85fa6705c60d15bce616a46f00df1b85b)
(cherry picked from commit cb9b8a31b25b27fa5e386b20f02e532bbf3462a2)
(cherry picked from commit 97f02df163e2b4e23b82e23e5ef57a586b17f021)
(cherry picked from commit 4611e10e6acef9185e1f8c84e63d1fe95fcf6436)
Fix gitlab migration unit test
Closes#1837.
The differences in dates can be explained by commit e19b9653ea, which
changed the order in which "created_date" and "updated_date" are
considered.
(cherry picked from commit b0bba20aa44e30ef0296b89f336d426224d73a16)
Mock HTTP requests in GitLab migration test
This introduces a new utility which can be added to other tests
making HTTP calls to a live service, to cache the responses of this
service in the repository.
(cherry picked from commit 52053b138948bd74c7eb88c0796c2e18f4247f3c)
Enable mocked HTTP responses for GitLab migration test
(cherry picked from commit 19cefc4de24b935a6a5c92be8360301f196f3aa5)
Simplify HTTP mocking utility in unit tests
Follow-up to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1841
(cherry picked from commit ca517c8bb4bf97f061b8b19fd3303d734f46660c)
(cherry picked from commit b227e0dd6bdf2dc3e8679443fc538fbce4b3bcf5)
(cherry picked from commit 6cc9d06556cda6c952a0542284fbe504114971ce)
(cherry picked from commit f0746e648dc30510d655b8a3b821199b2638800f)
(cherry picked from commit 414193341b8493723c16694789cbc08dc80b9ce5)
(cherry picked from commit 6e93df3bbb6c589502afc9dc74a7ae1a7c0f7da8)
(cherry picked from commit db0dbab5527c9f1783fd0eddb057c2d91cbb67e4)
(cherry picked from commit 8f9c9c63fbd3f266bb29d38791e83dc369cc1350)
(cherry picked from commit e74e26203095b675ccedbc2e166faed59369d467)
(cherry picked from commit 2e0933edcfa102b578fb3c2500f9e6af9e5ba1c7)
(cherry picked from commit 65060c69616631221d3dd9ef8b48fbcb007ad0c6)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix#16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
* Update go tool dependencies
Updated all tool dependencies to latest tags, hoping CI will like it.
* fix new lint errors
* handle more strings.Title cases
* remove lint skip
Storing the foreign identifier of an imported issue in the database is a prerequisite to implement idempotent migrations or mirror for issues. It is a baby step towards mirroring that introduces a new table.
At the moment when an issue is created by the Gitea uploader, it fails if the issue already exists. The Gitea uploader could be modified so that, instead of failing, it looks up the database to find an existing issue. And if it does it would update the issue instead of creating a new one. However this is not currently possible because an information is missing from the database: the foreign identifier that uniquely represents the issue being migrated is not persisted. With this change, the foreign identifier is stored in the database and the Gitea uploader will then be able to run a query to figure out if a given issue being imported already exists.
The implementation of mirroring for issues, pull requests, releases, etc. can be done in three steps:
1. Store an identifier for the element being mirrored (issue, pull request...) in the database (this is the purpose of these changes)
2. Modify the Gitea uploader to be able to update an existing repository with all it contains (issues, pull request...) instead of failing if it exists
3. Optimize the Gitea uploader to speed up the updates, when possible.
The second step creates code that does not yet exist to enable idempotent migrations with the Gitea uploader. When a migration is done for the first time, the behavior is not changed. But when a migration is done for a repository that already exists, this new code is used to update it.
The third step can use the code created in the second step to optimize and speed up migrations. For instance, when a migration is resumed, an issue that has an update time that is not more recent can be skipped and only newly created issues or updated ones will be updated. Another example of optimization could be that a webhook notifies Gitea when an issue is updated. The code triggered by the webhook would download only this issue and call the code created in the second step to update the issue, as if it was in the process of an idempotent migration.
The ForeignReferences table is added to contain local and foreign ID pairs relative to a given repository. It can later be used for pull requests and other artifacts that can be mirrored. Although the foreign id could be added as a single field in issues or pull requests, it would need to be added to all tables that represent something that can be mirrored. Creating a new table makes for a simpler and more generic design. The drawback is that it requires an extra lookup to obtain the information. However, this extra information is only required during migration or mirroring and does not impact the way Gitea currently works.
The foreign identifier of an issue or pull request is similar to the identifier of an external user, which is stored in reactions, issues, etc. as OriginalPosterID and so on. The representation of a user is however different and the ability of users to link their account to an external user at a later time is also a logic that is different from what is involved in mirroring or migrations. For these reasons, despite some commonalities, it is unclear at this time how the two tables (foreign reference and external user) could be merged together.
The ForeignID field is extracted from the issue migration context so that it can be dumped in files with dump-repo and later restored via restore-repo.
The GetAllComments downloader method is introduced to simplify the implementation and not overload the Context for the purpose of pagination. It also clarifies in which context the comments are paginated and in which context they are not.
The Context interface is no longer useful for the purpose of retrieving the LocalID and ForeignID since they are now both available from the PullRequest and Issue struct. The Reviewable and Commentable interfaces replace and serve the same purpose.
The Context data member of PullRequest and Issue becomes a DownloaderContext to clarify that its purpose is not to support in memory operations while the current downloader is acting but is not otherwise persisted. It is, for instance, used by the GitLab downloader to store the IsMergeRequest boolean and sort out issues.
---
[source](https://lab.forgefriends.org/forgefriends/forgefriends/-/merge_requests/36)
Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Co-authored-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
* GitLab reviews may not have the updated_at field set
Fallback to created_at if that the case and to time.Now() if it is
also missing.
Fixes: 18434
* use assert.WithinDuration
Co-authored-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
