Fix#14459
The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
(cherry picked from commit c42083a33950be6ee9f822c6d0de3c3a79d1f51b)
Conflicts:
models/repo/repo_list_test.go
tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
tests/integration/api_repo_test.go
shared fixture counts
Fixes (?) #25538
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/972
Regression #23879#23879 introduced a change which prevents read access to packages if a
user is not a member of an organization.
That PR also contained a change which disallows package access if the
team unit is configured with "no access" for packages. I don't think
this change makes sense (at the moment). It may be relevant for private
orgs. But for public or limited orgs that's useless because an
unauthorized user would have more access rights than the team member.
This PR restores the old behaviour "If a user has read access for an
owner, they can read packages".
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called
`Team.Authorize` in DB.
But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed
different units to have different permission.
The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if
org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission
of packages, they can also get write permission of packages.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
- Currently the function `GetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo` uses a query that
is able to have duplicated users in the result, this is can happen under
the condition that a user is in team that either is the owner team or
has permission to create organization repositories.
- Add test code to simulate the above condition for user 3,
[`TestGetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo`](a1fcb1cfb8/models/organization/org_test.go (L435))
is the test function that tests for this.
- The fix is quite trivial use a map keyed by user id in order to drop
duplicates.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Fixes#21206
If user and viewer are equal the method should return true.
Also the common organization check was wrong as `count` can never be
less then 0.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation
* Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it
* Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters
* Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public)
* Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses
* Add basic repo access tests for restricted users
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Mention restricted users in the faq
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap`
* Add type `userAccess`
* Add convenience func updateUserAccess()
* Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess`
* updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks
* even tighter
* Avoid extra loop
* Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users
* Don't assume block only applies to orgs
* Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering
* fix yet another thinko
* Ok - no need for u
* Revert "Ok - no need for u"
This reverts commit 5c3e886aabd5acd997a3b35687d322439732c200.
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Add team permission setting to allow creating repo in organization.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Add test case for creating repo when have team creation access.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* build error: should omit comparison to bool constant
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Add comment on exported functions
* Fix fixture consistency, fix existing unit tests
* Fix boolean comparison in xorm query.
* addCollaborator and changeCollaborationAccessMode separate steps
More clear to use different if-cases.
* Create and commit xorm session
* fix
* Add information of create repo permission in team sidebar
* Add migration step
* Clarify that repository creator will be administrator.
* Fix some things after merge
* Fix language text that use html
* migrations file
* Create repository permission -> Create repositories
* fix merge
* fix review comments
* org/members: display 2FA state
* fix comment typo
* lay down UserList bases
* add basic test for previous methods
* add comment for UserList type
* add valid two-fa account
* test new UserList methods
* optimize MembersIsPublic by side loading info on GetMembers + fix integrations tests
* respect fmt rules
* use map for data
* Optimize GetTwoFaStatus
* rewrite by using existing sub func
* Optimize IsUserOrgOwner
* remove un-used code
* tests: cover empty org + fix import order
* tests: add ErrTeamNotExist path
* tests: fix wrong expected result
* Add repo type option to /api/repo/search
* Add tests and fix result of collaborative filter in specific condition
* Fix/optimize search & tests
* Improve integration tests
* Fix lint errors
* Fix unit tests
* Change and improve internal implementation of repo search
* Use NonexistentID
* Make search api more general
* Change mirror and fork search behaviour
* Fix tests & typo in comment
